The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NORBERT CONRADS, MARTIN WEIBRECHT, ULRICH SCHIEBEL and
HERFRIED K. WIECZOREK
____________
Appeal No. 2003-2103
Application No. 09/826,256
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, JERRY SMITH and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2 and
4-8, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
The appellants’ invention relates to an x-ray examination apparatus comprising a
correction unit which takes into account delayed emission of charges from a previous
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007