Appeal No. 2003-2127 Application No. 09/976,226 The examiner’s characterization that the weights produced by the motion estimator 118 and supplied by the operation of switch 109 serve as “motion indices to the motion vectors” (answer, top of page 4) is amply supported according to the teachings of Lavagetto as well. There are numerous instances in this reference where the motion vectors are stated to have “corresponding optional weights” (see the bottom of column 2; column 7, lines 20 through 26; column 13, lines 19 through 26 and column 18, lines 17 through 24). Moreover, from our study of this reference, we are independently persuaded by other teachings of the anticipatory nature of the representative subject matter of claim 1 on appeal. The discussion of the prior art in the Background of the Invention at columns 1 and 2 of Lavagetto indicates that motion vectors and weighting factors are known to be “quantized or encoded as appropriate for transmission or storage.” (column 2, lines 43 through 47). A second basis also exists according to the discussion in paragraph bridging columns 5 and 6, which teaches that the motion estimator produces motion vectors which are supplied to the motion compensator 128 through switch 108 and eventually provided 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007