Appeal No. 2003-2154
Application No. 09/735,895 Page 10
persuasive. It follows that we shall also sustain the
examiner’s § 103(a) rejection of claims 15, 19-24, 35 and 39-44.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 4, 5, 7-15,
19-24, 35 and 39-44 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being patentable
over Gammel in view of Blaustein and Devir is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007