The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte DANIEL N. DUNCAN, ALEXANDER N. SVORONOS, and THOMAS J. MILLER _____________ Appeal No. 2004-0008 Application No. 09/547,627 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 50. Representative claim 1 is reproduced below: 1. A method for ordering inbound inquiries, the method comprising: receiving plural inbound inquiries, each inbound inquiry having associated inquiry information;Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007