Ex Parte KITAYAMA et al - Page 2




                Appeal No. 2004-0018                                                                                  Page 2                   
                Application No. 09/220,018                                                                                                     


                                                            INTRODUCTION                                                                       
                         The claims are directed to a foamed polypropylene sheet with cells which are oblong in                                
                the thickness direction of the sheet.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal:                                
                         1.  A foamed thermoplastic resin sheet, having a foaming ratio of not less than 2.5,                                  
                wherein cells, existing in an interior part which extends inward from a depth of 20 percent of the                             
                whole thickness of said sheet from the front and rear surfaces thereof, respectively, in a thickness                           
                direction thereof and from 15 percent of the width of said sheet from both side edges,                                         
                respectively, satisfy the following expressions (1) and [(2):]2                                                                
                                 0.5 # D/C # 0.9 . . . (1)                                                                                     
                                 0.5 # E/C # 0.9 . . . (2)                                                                                     
                         where C represents a mean cell diameter in the thickness direction of said formed sheet,                              
                D represents a mean cell diameter in an extrusion direction of the same, and E represents a mean                               
                cell diameter in the width direction of the same, and where the thermoplastic resin is                                         
                polypropylene resin.                                                                                                           

                         The Examiner rejects the claims as unpatentable over prior art.  As evidence of                                       
                unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art references:                                                  
                Shirai et al. (Shirai)                             4,626,183                                 Dec.  2, 1986                     
                Deblander                                          5,147,481                                 Sep. 15, 1992                     





                         2“(2):” was present in the claim before the Amendment of May 29, 2001 and it appears that its deletion was            
                not intentional.                                                                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007