Ex Parte PODILCHUCK et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                
          of the Board.                                                               

                                                            Paper No. 17              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                         Ex parte CHRISTINE IRENE PODILCHUCK                          
                                         and                                          
                               SERGIO DANIEL SERVETTO                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-0042                                  
                               Application 09/368,380                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s              
          final rejection of claims 1 through 8, 11 through 18 and 21                 
          through 26.  Because the examiner has indicated at pages 1                  


                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007