Ex Parte Bollinger - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                          Paper No. 19                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte ROBERT A. BOLLINGER                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-0106                                  
                               Application 09/907,974                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before MCQUADE, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Robert A. Bollinger originally took this appeal from the               
          final rejection (Paper No. 12) of claims 24 through 27, 29                  
          through 35 and 43 through 47, all of the claims pending in the              
          application.  As the appellant has chosen not to proceed with               
          respect to claims 43 through 47 (see page 2 in the main brief,              
          Paper No. 14), the appeal as to these claims is hereby dismissed,           
          leaving for review the standing rejection of claims 24 through 27           
          and 29 through 35.                                                          










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007