The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NEIL E. MORROW and ROBERT J. MORROW ____________ Appeal No. 2004-0136 Application No. 09/761,340 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 57-61, 65, 68, 69, 72 and 97-102. Claims 62-64, 66, 67, 70, 71 and 73-83 have been withdrawn from consideration as being as being drawn to a non-elected species, and the remaining claims have been canceled. We AFFIRM-IN-PART AND ENTER A NEW REJECTION UNDER 37 CFR § 1.196(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007