Appeal No. 2004-0150 Application No. 09/772,481 Appellant’s arguments in support of patentability do not persuade us of error in the rejection over the prior art. We sustain the rejection of claims 1-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Walker and Sonnenfeld. CONCLUSION The rejection of claims 1-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT STUART S. LEVY ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007