Appeal No. 2004-0152
Application No. 29/149,571
elevational, top plan, and bottom plan views in Figures 1 through
6, respectively.
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Molins et al 3,948,389 Apr. 6, 1976
(Molins)
Tillander Des. 249,870 Oct. 10, 1978
Huntley Des. 422,497 Apr. 11, 2000
The following rejection is before us for review.
The design claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Tillander in view of Huntley and Molins.
The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper
No. 9), while the complete statement of appellants’ argument can
be found in the brief (Paper No. 8).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007