Appeal No. 2004-0160
Application No. 09/939,993
regard that Chimera discloses at column 4, lines 63-68, a concern
for preventing excessive heat in the tube 14.
The examiner should reevaluate the patentability of the
appealed claims in light of Caruso and Chimera, either alone or in
combination with any other prior art of which the examiner may be
aware.
Summary
The decision of the examiner is finally rejecting the appealed
claims reversed.
This application is remanded to the examiner for consideration
of the matters discussed above.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007