Appeal No. 2004-0170 Application No. 09/288,450 particular application disclosure as it would be interpreted by one possessing the ordinary level of skill in the pertinent art. Id. Read in light of the description of the cutting sequence on pages 7 and 8 of the underlying specification and the depiction thereof in Figures 10A through 10D, the construction and arrangement of the blades set forth in claims 1, 5 and 11 to deflect the product segments as specified is reasonably particular and precise, if not exceedingly so. Hence, the examiner’s concern that claims 1, 5 and 11 are indefinite is unfounded. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, rejection of claims 1, 5 and 11. II. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejections of claims 1 through 5, 11, 15 and 16 Poloni ‘033 and Poloni ‘291, the examiner’s primary references, disclose high speed flying shears for cutting the leading and trailing ends of rolled stock (e.g., wires, bars, rods) moving longitudinally through the shears. Each shear includes blades 13 mounted on counter-rotating drums 30, a shearing axis 15 defined by the blades and a laterally movable switch 16 for feeding stock to the blades. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007