Ex Parte Schooler - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0200                                                        
          Application No. 09/908,709                                                  

          said battery and converting said electrical energy into                     
          mechanical energy;                                                          
                    a drive train receiving said mechanical energy for                
          moving said vehicle;                                                        
                    pedals operable by an occupant of said vehicle to                 
          create mechanical energy;                                                   
                    a first generator converting said mechanical energy               
          from said pedals to first electrical energy, said first                     
          electrical energy from said generator supplied to said electrical           
          motor; and                                                                  
                    an internal combustion engine supplying energy to said            
          drive train.                                                                
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Dessert                           4,181,188          Jan. 1, 1980           
          Deguchi et al. (Deguchi)          6,083,139          Jul. 4, 2000           
          Chung et al. (Chung)              6,114,775          Sep. 5, 2000           
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:            
          claims 1, 3-6, 8 and 9 over Dessert in view of Deguchi, and                 
          claim 7 over Dessert in view of Deguchi and Chung.                          
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejections.                               
               The appellant states that the claims stand or fall together            
          (brief, page 2).  Although an additional reference is applied to            
          claim 7, the appellant does not separately argue that claim.  We            
          therefore limit our discussion to one claim, i.e., claim 1, which           
          is the sole independent claim.  See In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565,             
          1566 n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR                 
          § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).                                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007