Appeal No. 2004-0241 Page 9 Application No. 09/773,366 Claims 17-20, which are dependent from claim 15, stand rejected on the basis of Schubert in view of Manning ‘037, which was applied for teaching a stock feeder mechanism comprising a detection system. As we determined above in evaluating the Section 102 rejection of claim 15, Schubert fails to disclose or teach a brake system to slow the speed of the feeder mechanism during the stock feeding operation. Considering Schubert in the light of Section 103 does not alter this finding, for the examiner has adduced no evidence to support a conclusion that it would have been obvious to provide this feature in the Schubert system. Manning ‘037 fails to overcome this deficiency, and therefore the present rejection cannot be sustained.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007