Appeal No. 2004-0253 Application 09/933,821 38) and, for those reasons, will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 40 through 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). In summary: the examiner’s proposed rejections of claims 21 through 34, 36, 37, 39 through 42, 44 through 47, 49, 50, 53, 55 through 57, 59 and 60 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) have not been sustained. Thus, the examiner’s decision in the application before us on appeal is reversed. REVERSED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JEFFREY V. NASE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) CEF:pgc 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007