Ex Parte Fabry et al - Page 4




         Appeal No.  2004-0273                                                      
         Application No.  09/958,702                                                

         invention to be established, the prior art as applied must be              
         such that it would have provided one of ordinary skill in the art          
         with both a suggestion to carry out appellants’ claimed invention          
         and a reasonable expectation of success in so doing.  See In re            
         Dow Chem. Co., 837 F.2d 469, 473, 5 USPQ2d 1529, 1531 (Fed. Cir.           
         1988).  “Both the suggestion and the expectation of success must           
         be founded in the prior art, not in the applicant’s disclosure.”           
         Id.   Also, “[o]bviousness cannot be established by combining the          
         teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention,               
         absent some teaching, suggestion or incentive supporting the               
         combination.”  In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d 1276,             
         1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987).                                                     
              Here, the examiner has not established that the skilled               
         artisan would have found it obvious to combine Garlisi’s                   
         particularly disclosed esters in the composition of Ansmann when           
         Ansmann’s composition includes fatty alcohols, while Garlisi’s             
         composition does not include fatty alcohols.  That is, Garlisi’s           
         use of the particularly disclosed esters is not used in the                
         context of a fatty alcohol containing composition.  Adding                 
         Garlisi’s particularly disclosed esters to the composition of              
         Ansmann may have been obvious to try, but this does not                    
         constitute the standard for combining references under §103.  In           
         re Geiger, 815 F.2d at 687, 2 USPQ2d at 1278; cf. In re Wesslau,           
         353 F.2d 238, 241, 147 USPQ 391, 393 (CCPA 1965).                          
              Garlisi does teach use of hydroxycarboxylic acid alkyl                
         and/or alkenyl oligoglycoside esters as surfactants.  The esters           
         are very efficient surfactants, having excellent detergent                 
         properties.  See the paragraph bridging pages 5-6 of Garlisi.  On          
         page 6, at lines 13-14, Garlisi teaches that the esters prove to           
         be compatible with most of known surfactants and therefore they            
         may be formularized with them.  Yet, Garlisi does not teach that           
         in fact the disclosed esters would function as such when combined          
                                        -4-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007