Appeal No. 2004-0344 Application No. 09/759,016 the claimed invention, either expressly or inherently, such that a person of ordinary skill in the art could practice the invention without undue experimentation. In applying a rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e), the examiner must show how each and every claim element is taught in the reference and the examiner, in the instant case, has not done so. Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-7 under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, 112 and 102(e) is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -8–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007