Ex Parte Monigle et al - Page 18




              Appeal No. 2004-0366                                                               Page 18                
              Application No. 09/848,044                                                                                


              Mudd is reversed; the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 15, 18 to 21, 24                    
              and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Zachner is reversed; the                          
              decision of the examiner to reject claims 22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        
              unpatentable over Mudd in view of Meuse or Luikkonen is reversed; the decision of the                     
              examiner to reject claims 22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                      
              Zachner in view of Meuse or Luikkonen is reversed; the decision of the examiner to                        
              reject claims 1, 2, 7 to 9, 15 to 21, 24 and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                            
              unpatentable over Ferguson in view of Steenhoudt or Barnes is reversed; and the                           
              decision of the examiner to reject claims 22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        
              unpatentable over Ferguson in view of Steenhoudt or Barnes, and further in view of                        
              Meuse or Luikkonen is reversed.                                                                           























Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007