Ex Parte Varn - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 19           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
                               Ex parte HAROLD T. VARN                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2004-0367                                  
                             Application No. 09/733,359                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 6 through 11, which are all             
          of the claims remaining in this application.  Claim 5 has been              
          canceled.                                                                   


          As noted on page 3 of the specification, appellant's                        
          invention is directed to a dorsal carpal tunnel splint which                
          limits wrist flexion and extension during repetitive hand motion,           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007