The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SANJEEV MIDHA, SHARI RENEE THOMSON,
and MICHAEL ALBERT SNYDER
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0369
Application No. 09/822,704
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before TIMM, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1-3, 6-18, 20, and 22-26. Claims 4, 5, 19, 21, and 26-34, the
only other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn from consideration by the
Examiner pursuant to an election/restriction requirement. We have jurisdiction over the appeal
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007