Ex Parte Hansen - Page 9



          Appeal No. 2004-0388                                                        
          Application No. 09/749,620                                                  
                                      DECISION                                        
               The rejections of claims 1, 10-15, 18 and 19 under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 102(e) over Owen, and the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of             
          claims 2, 16, 17, 20 and 22 over Owen in view of Olson, claims 6-           
          9, 16 and 22 over Owen in view of Tacker, and claims 1, 2, 6-20             
          and 22 over Olson in view of Owen and Tacker, are reversed.  A              
          new ground of rejection of claims 1, 7, 10-14, 16, 18, 20 and 22            
          has been introduced under 37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to           
          37 CFR § 1.196(b).  37 CFR § 1.196(b) provides that, “A new                 
          ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of           
          judicial review.”                                                           
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN             
          TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of              
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (§ 1.197(c)) as to            
          the rejected claims:                                                        
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims                 
               so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                      
               claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                       
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard under                 
               § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and                          
               Interferences upon the same record. . . .                              


                                          9                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007