The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT H. JOHNSTON ____________ Appeal No. 2004-0404 Application No. 08/992,878 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Robert H. Johnston originally took this appeal from the final rejection (Paper No. 20) of claims 1, 3, 6, 8 and 19, all of the claims pending in the application. Upon consideration of the appellant’s main brief (Paper No. 23), the examiner issued an Office action (Paper No. 24) reopening prosecution and entering a superseding rejection of the claims. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.193(b)(2)(ii), the appellant then filed a supplemental brief (Paper No. 26) with a request that the appeal be reinstated. Implicitly granting the request, the examiner entered an answer (Paper No. 27), noted a reply brief (Paper No. 28) filed by thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007