Appeal No. 2004-0410 Application No. 09/509,415 the tray design of Mojden ‘278 is such that the sticks contained therein would not exhibit the inadvertent depalletizing problem which is solved by the pallet wrapping technique of Mojden ‘010. Second, the objectives of Mojden ‘278 would be frustrated by the pallet wrapping technique of Mojden ‘010. For example, an objective of Mojden ‘278 is “to provide an automatic tray loading and unloading system for accommodating and balancing operations among multiple stations in a multiple station can end processing and handling facility” (column 2, lines 62-65). Toward this end, the invention of Mojden ‘278 comprises “an automatic loading and unloading system for loading articles [i.e., sticks] supplied from a first location at a rate commensurate with the rate at which articles are supplied from said first location, into trays and for unloading said articles from said trays for transport to a second location at a rate commensurate with the demand for said articles at said second location, and for balancing a supply of articles loaded onto said trays with variations in both the rate of supply thereof and the rate of demand therefor” (column 2, line 67, through column 3, line 8). Thus, an artisan would have been disinclined to provide the invention of Mojden ‘278 with the pallet wrapping technique of Mojden ‘010 as proposed by the examiner because the presence of the pallet wrapping material 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007