The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 32 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BLAINE D. GAITHER and ROBERT B. SMITH __________ Appeal No. 2004-0412 Application No. 09/052,358 __________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before THOMAS, BARRETT and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7-10 and 12, and refusal to allow claims 5 and 11 as amended after final rejection. These are all of the claims pending in the application. THE INVENTION The appellants claim a method and system for analyzing the effectiveness of a computer cache. Claim 1, which claims the method, is illustrative: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007