The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FLORIAN BRABETZ, PETER GEISSLINGER,
and GERD KLIMM
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0413
Application No. 09/752,301
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-8, all the claims currently pending in the
application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a motorized wheelbarrow
having a wheelbarrow wheel including an electric hub motor for
driving the wheelbarrow wheel. A further understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of claim 1, the sole
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007