Ex Parte AKAMA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0422                                                        
          Application No. 09/046,315                                                  


               Claim 5 is representative of the claimed invention and is              
          reproduced as follows:                                                      
          5.   An apparatus for detection of a cut in compressed motion               
          picture data, the apparatus comprising:                                     
               extracting means for extracting data from said compressed              
          motion picture data which is received as a data stream                      
          partitioned into a plurality of intra frames each having an equal           
          number of bits;                                                             
               data comparing means for comparing said compressed motion              
          picture data at corresponding locations of adjacent ones of said            
          frames of the stream; and                                                   
               cut judging means for judging the presence or absence of a             
          cut by the result of the comparison by said comparing means.                

                                     References                                       
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:               
          Saito                         5,204,706           Apr. 20, 1993             
          Liou et al. (Liou)            5,835,163           Nov. 10, 1998             
                                                  (Filed Dec. 21, 1995)               
                                 Rejections At Issue                                  
               Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                   
          paragraph as containing subject matter which was not described in           
          the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the             
          art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly                   
          connected, to make and/or use the invention.                                
               Claims 5-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being              
          anticipated by Liou.                                                        



                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007