Ex Parte ARANDA et al - Page 6

          Appeal No. 2004-0429                                                        
          Application 09/335,289                                                      


                                     Conclusion                                       
               In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained             
          the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 of claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-18,             
          and 20.                                                                     

                                      REVERSED                                        







                         JAMES D. THOMAS               )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON           )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                         ALLEN R. MACDONALD            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              


          ARM:pgc                                                                     

                                          6                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007