Ex Parte MUSACCHIA - Page 3




              Appeal No. 2004-0430                                                                  Page 3                
              Application No. 09/174,868                                                                                  


                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                        
              the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the final                           
              rejection (Paper No. 24, mailed September 24, 2002) and the answer (Paper No. 30,                           
              mailed April 29, 2003) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection,                   
              and to the brief (Paper No. 27, filed March 24, 2003) for the appellant's arguments                         
              thereagainst.                                                                                               


                                                       OPINION                                                            
                     In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to                      
              the appellant's specification and claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to the                    
              respective positions articulated by the appellant and the examiner.  Upon evaluation of                     
              all the evidence before us, it is our conclusion that the evidence adduced by the                           
              examiner is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to                     
              the claims under appeal.  Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner's rejection of                      
              claims 1 and 3 to 18 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Our reasoning for this determination                           
              follows.                                                                                                    


                     In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner bears the initial burden                     
              of presenting a prima facie case of obviousness.  See In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531,                         
              1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993).  A prima facie case of obviousness is                          








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007