The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ANTHONY F. HERBST and WAYNE F. PERG
________________
Appeal No. 2004-0511
Application 09/375,817
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-39, which constitute
all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a computer-aided
method for operating a synthetic investment fund having at least
two different classes of interest.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007