Appeal No. 2004-0515
Application No. 09/400,960
390 U.S. 1000 (1968). Accordingly, since all of the claim
limitations are not taught or suggested by the disclosure of
Rasky, we do not sustain the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
rejection of appealed claims 1 and 2. Therefore, the decision of
the Examiner rejecting claims 1 and 2 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007