Appeal No. 2004-0518
Application No. 09/514,227
find it is a step in creating the resource profile. Accordingly, we find that Win does not
teach all of the limitations of independent claims 1, 18 and 27, and as such we find that
Win does not anticipate the claims.
Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4 through 6,
10, 12, 13, 18, 21 through 23, 27, 30 through 56 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 anticipated by
Win.
Reversed
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROBERT NAPPI )
))
Administrative Patent Judge
RN/RWK
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007