Appeal No. 2004-0522 Application No. 09/678,045 art, and claim 18 is not. Thus, what appeared to appellants as an inconsistency in our decision, is not an inconsistency at all. In summary, appellants’ request for rehearing has been granted to the extent that this panel of the Board has reconsidered its earlier decision, but is denied with respect to making any substantive changes in that decision, for the reasons articulated, supra. DENIED IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JOHN P. McQUADE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ICC:pgc 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007