Appeal No. 2004-0529
Application No. 09/328,931
Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Hartt.
Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being anticipated by Bennie.
Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Black.
Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Kunz.
The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to
the argument presented by appellant appears in the office action
dated December 13, 2002 and the answer (Paper Nos. 31 and 33),
while the complete statement of appellant's argument can be found
in the main and supplemental appeal briefs (Paper Nos. 30 and
32).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007