Ex Parte Cates et al - Page 2




            Appeal No.  2004-0530                                                                             
            Application No. 09/696,557                                                                        
                                             THE INVENTION                                                    
                   Appellants’ claimed invention relates to a magnetic tape head assembly comprising          
            read elements, write elements and servo readers placed asymmetrically about the center of         
            the tape head taken perpendicular to the direction of the tape motion.  According to              
            Appellants, the invention produces a tape head that is less complex than standard tape            
            heads.  (Brief, p. 3).  Claim 1 which is representative of the subject matter on appeal is        
            reproduced below:                                                                                 
                   1.  A magnetic tape head assembly comprising:                                              
                   read elements;                                                                             
                   write elements; and                                                                        
                   servo readers placed asymmetrically about the center of the tape head taken                
                   perpendicular to the direction of tape motion.                                             
                   As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following references:2          
            Dee et al.  (Dee)                      5,963,401                 Oct. 5, 19999                    
            Appellants’ admitted prior art represented by Figure 1 and the discussion thereof                 
            appearing in the specification, pages 5 to 7.                                                     






                   2  Several additional references have been cited in the Answer, pages 3-4;  however, the   
            Examiner has not included these references in the statement of the rejections or provided further 
            discussion of the references in the Answer.                                                       
                                                     -2-                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007