Ex Parte Gormley et al - Page 1



                            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            
                                                                                            Paper No. 14                 
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                    __________                                                           

                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
                                Ex parte GLENN J. GORMLEY, KEITH D. KAUFMAN,                                             
                              ELIZABETH STONER and JOANNE WALDSTREICHER                                                  
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                Appeal No. 2004-0543                                                     
                                              Application No. 10/010,678                                                 
                                                     __________                                                          
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                     __________                                                          
              Before SCHEINER, MILLS and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
              SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     
                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134 from the final rejection of                      
              claims 28-37, the only claims remaining.  Claims 28, 30, 33 and 36 are representative:                     
                     28.  A method of treating androgenic alopecia comprising transdermally                              
              administering to a person in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount                     
              of a 5alpha-reductase 2 inhibitor.                                                                         
                     30.  The method according to claim 28, wherein the 5alpha-reductase 2 inhibitor                     
              is transdermally administered by a transdermal skin patch.                                                 
                     33.  A method of treating androgenic alopecia comprising transdermally                              
              administering to a person in need of such treatment a therapeutically effective amount                     
              of 17β-(N-tert-butylcarbamoyl)-4-aza-5α-androst-1-ene-3-one.                                               
                     36.  A transdermal skin patch comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a                    
              5alpha-reductase 2 inhibitor.                                                                              
                     The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                       






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007