Appeal No. 2004-0557
Application No. 08/829,187
Claim 7
Claim 7 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Amano in view of Buchin. As discussed supra,
Amano alone does not teach or suggest a noise reduction system
that combines two non-noise-reduced signals. The examiner has not
shown, nor do we find, that Buchin remedies the shortcomings of
Amano. Therefore, we will not sustain the obviousness rejection
of claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007