Ex Parte Wilfer - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2004-0603                                                               Page 2                
             Application No. 09/713,353                                                                               


                                                  BACKGROUND                                                          
                    The appellant’s invention relates to a case for musical instruments comprising a                  
             shell, a device for carrying the case and attachable to the shell, such as shoulder belts                
             and handles, and an element for receiving a communication device provided on the                         
             device for carrying the case (specification, pages 1 and 2).  Representative claims 12                   
             and 19 are reproduced, infra, in the opinion section of this decision.                                   
                    The examiner relied upon the following prior art references in rejecting the                      
             appealed claims:                                                                                         
             Ekman et al. (Ekman)                      4,764,962            Aug. 16, 1988                             
             Gormley et al. (Gormley)                  5,711,469            Jan. 27, 1998                             
             Fowles et al. (Fowles)                    6,123,240            Sep. 26, 2000                             
                                                                     (filed Oct. 20, 1998)                            
             Fiedler                                   EP 756,266           Jul.   30, 1997                           
             Miyako et al. (Miyako)                    9-154618             Jun. 17, 19971                            
                    (Japanese patent publication)                                                                     
                    The following rejections are before us for review.                                                
                    Claims 12, 14, 152 and 17-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        
             unpatentable over Fiedler in view of Miyako and Ekman.                                                   


                    1 We derive our understanding of the Fiedler and Miyako references from the translations,         
             provided by the USPTO, copies of which have been mailed to appellant (see page 3 of the answer, Paper    
             No. 15).  The Miyako reference was referred to by the examiner and appellant as “Nobuhide.”              
                    2 Claim 15 had been rejected in the final rejection (Paper No. 9) as being unpatentable over      
             Fiedler in view of Miyako, Ekman and Richards (U.S. Pat. No. 4,237,341).  In light of the amendment      
             (Paper No. 10) filed subsequent to the final rejection, the rejection has been changed to reflect the    
             amendment to claim 15.                                                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007