The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KOICHI TAMURA __________ Appeal No. 2004-0612 Application No. 09/531,660 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before PAK, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-9. Claim 10, which is the only other claim in the application, stands allowable. THE INVENTION The appellant claims an X-ray analysis apparatus. Claims 1 and 5 are illustrative: 1. A fluorescent X-ray analysis apparatus comprising: an X-ray source for generating a primary X-ray; 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007