Ex Parte BLISH et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0621                                                        
          Application No. 09/193,193                                                  

          includes a conductive layer, and the insulator is separated from            
          this conductive layer by a gap (Brief, page 3).  Appellants state           
          that this gap is formed by removal of a portion of a barrier layer          
          disposed between the conductive layer and the insulator, while the          
          conductive line is physically detached from the insulator and thus          
          is capable of being removed by lifting off the conductive layer             
          (id.).  Representative independent claim 8 is reproduced below:             
               8.  A semiconductor device that is at least partially                  
          deprocessed, the semiconductor device comprising:                           
               at least one conductive line including a conductive layer; and         
               an insulator surrounding a portion of the conductive line, the         
          insulator being separated from the conductive layer by a gap, the           
          gap being formed by removal of a portion of a barrier layer                 
          disposed between the conductive layer and the insulator, the                
          portion of the barrier layer being removed by exposing a second             
          portion of the barrier layer by removing a portion of the                   
          insulator; and                                                              
               etching the portion barrier layer after the portion of the             
          insulator is removed; and                                                   
               wherein the conductive line is physically detached from the            
          insulator and is capable of being removed by lifting off the                
          conductive layer.                                                           
               The examiner relies on Grill et al. (Grill), U.S. Patent No.           
          5,869,880, issued on Feb. 9, 1999 (filed Mar. 13, 1996), as the             
          sole evidentiary basis for the rejections on appeal (Answer, page           
          3).  Claims 8 and 10-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as          
          anticipated by Grill (Answer, page 4).  Claim 9 stands rejected             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007