The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte NOBUYUKI KOBAYASHI and TAKUJI HATANO __________ Appeal No. 2004-0632 Application No. 09/748,312 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before KIMLIN, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a single liquid crystal element comprising a single liquid crystal layer disposed between a pair of substrates with an electrode andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007