Ex Parte Dunham et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-0643                                                        
          Application No. 09/682,211                                                  


               1.   A method for delivering radiation directly to a target            
                    within a patient, the target being tissue having a                
                    malignant pathology, said method comprising the steps             
                    of:                                                               
                         generating radiation from a portable source;                 
                         collecting radiation generated from said portable            
                         source;                                                      
                         coupling collected radiation to a capillary tube             
                         system;                                                      
                         delivering coupled radiation directly to the                 
                         target through the capillary tube system.                    
                                    THE REFERENCE                                     
          Vali et al. (Vali)            4,122,342            Oct. 24, 1978            
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1, 4, 4, 5, 8-11, 13-15 and 18-23 stand rejected                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Vali.                      
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                
               The appellants state that the claims stand or fall                     
          separately (brief, page 4).  The appellants, however, do not                
          separately argue the patentability of any claim.  Consequently,             
          the claims stand or together.  See In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565,              
          1566 n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR                 
          § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).  We therefore limit our discussion to one              
          claim, i.e., claim 1.                                                       
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007