Ex Parte WOLFE et al - Page 12




              Appeal No. 2004-0658                                                                Page 12                 
              Application No. 09/419,579                                                                                  


              through an opening defined in the manually graspable portion as recited in claims 4, 5                      
              and 9 to 13, or (2) a flared horn portion adjacent another opening defined in the                           
              manually graspable portion as recited in claims 4, 5 and 9, 10 and 12.                                      


                     For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 4,                    
              5 and 9 to 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                            


                                                     CONCLUSION                                                           
                     To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 and 6 under                            
              35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is affirmed and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 to 5                     
              and 7 to 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed with respect to claims 2, 3, 7 and 8 and                      
              reversed with respect to claims 4, 5 and 9 to 13.                                                           






















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007