Ex Parte CHENG et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2004-0663                                                                                   
             Application No. 09/375,260                                                                             


                                                 BACKGROUND                                                         
                    Appellants’ invention relates to a modification system for supporting localized                 
             data changes in a mobile device.  An understanding of the invention can be derived                     
             from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                        
                           1.     A method of localizing changes in a computer, the method                          
                    comprising:                                                                                     
                           executing a change to data in a computer having a local database,                        
                    the change being performed by the computer to modify data in the local                          
                    database stored within a data storage device at the computer;                                   
                           indicating, on the computer, whether the change is a global change                       
                    or a local change; and                                                                          
                           when the local database on the computer is synchronized with a main                      
             database on another computer, transmitting only global changes from the local                          
             database to the main database and not transmitting local changes.                                      

                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                 
             appealed claims are:                                                                                   
             Boothby                           6,141,664                         Oct. 31, 2000                      
                                                                    (Filed Nov. 13, 1996)                           
             Mendez                            6,151,606                   Nov. 21, 2000                            
                                                                    (Filed Jan.16, 1998)                            
                    Claims 1-42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing                  
             to particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention.  Claims 1, 2, 15, 16, 29, and            
             30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Mendez.  Claims 3-14,                  



                                                         2                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007