Appeal No. 2004-0672 Application No. 09/894,704 examiner as depending from a rejected claim but otherwise allowable. The subject matter on appeal relates to a water shower apparatus. With reference to Figures 1-9 of the appellants’ drawing,1 the apparatus comprises a main body 1 having a plurality of arms 11 and a plurality of spray nozzles 8, 9 and 14-16. Further details of this appealed subject matter are set forth in representative independent claims 40 and 56 which read as follows: 40. A water shower apparatus comprising: a main body positioned behind a back of a bather, a plurality of arms supported movably on said main body, and a spray nozzle on each of said arms for spraying water, wherein said arms are movable towards and away from each other, and a width of positions where said arms are supported by said main body is narrower than a breadth of shoulders of the bather. 56. A water shower apparatus comprising: a plurality of arms movable to a showering position and spraying water from a water source, 1 1 As correctly explained by the examiner on pages 1 and 2 of the answer, the appellants’ “SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION” on page 2 of the brief incorrectly describes the subject matter on appeal with reference to their Figures 10 et seq. which relate to a nonelected species (e.g., see Paper No. 11). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007