Ex Parte Van Dommelen et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                  Ex parte MARK JOSEPHUS LUCIEN MARIA VAN DOMMELEN                    
          and PAULUS ALBERTUS MARIA VERMEULEN                                         
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-0699                                  
                               Application 09/873,564                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before PAK, WARREN, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1 and 3,             
          which are all of the claims pending in the application.                     
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a high-pressure discharge lamp having             
          an outer bulb which is substantially tubular in shape and is                
          provided with a light-scattering layer.  Claim 1 is illustrative:           




                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007