Ex Parte Belanger et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                          Paper No. 21                
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                        Ex parte THOMAS DUDLEY BELANGER, JR.                          
                              and DAVID JOHN RUTKOWSKI                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2004-0706                                  
                             Application No. 09/777,982                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Thomas Dudley Belanger, Jr. et al. originally took this                
          appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 36, all of              
          the claims pending in the application.1  As the examiner has                
          since withdrawn all rejections of claims 33, 34 and 36, the                 
          appeal as to these claims is hereby dismissed, leaving for review           
          the standing rejections of claims 1 through 32 and 35.  Claim 33            
          now stands objected to as depending from a rejected base claim              
          and claims 34 and 36 now stand allowed.                                     

               1 Claims 23, 27 and 34 through 36 have been amended                    
          subsequent to final rejection.                                              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007