The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte THOMAS DUDLEY BELANGER, JR. and DAVID JOHN RUTKOWSKI __________ Appeal No. 2004-0706 Application No. 09/777,982 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Thomas Dudley Belanger, Jr. et al. originally took this appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 36, all of the claims pending in the application.1 As the examiner has since withdrawn all rejections of claims 33, 34 and 36, the appeal as to these claims is hereby dismissed, leaving for review the standing rejections of claims 1 through 32 and 35. Claim 33 now stands objected to as depending from a rejected base claim and claims 34 and 36 now stand allowed. 1 Claims 23, 27 and 34 through 36 have been amended subsequent to final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007