Ex Parte Rodriguez et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0716                                             Page 2            
          Application No. 09544,275                                                          

          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                       
          reproduced as follows:                                                             
                1. In a telecommunications system providing communication                    
          channels for the transmission of data between system stations, a                   
          setup for reducing transmission bandwidth use comprising:                          
                means for connecting a plurality of stations through said                    
          communication channels;                                                            
                means for providing an active state for at least one of said                 
          connecting channels granting maximum bandwidth for the                             
          transmission of data;                                                              
                means for detecting an on-hold condition in said connecting                  
          channel; and                                                                       
                means responsive to a detection of on-hold, for providing a                  
          minimal activity state for said connecting channel granting a                      
          minimal bandwidth.                                                                 
                The prior art references of record relied upon by the                        
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                     
          Sawyer                                 5,828,737       Oct. 27, 1998               
          Brakefield et al. (Brakefield)         6,047,006       Apr.  4, 2000               
                Claims 1-3, 6-8, 11-14 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sawyer.                                        
                Claims 4, 5, 9, 10, 15, 16 and 18 stand rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sawyer in view of                       
          Brakefield.                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007