Appeal No. 2004-0765 Application 09/732,641 275, 276 n.4 (CCPA 1968); In re Larson, 340 F.2d 965, 967-68, 144 USPQ 347, 349 (CCPA 1965); Henderson v. Grable, 339 F.2d 465, 470, 144 USPQ 91, 96 (CCPA 1964); and In re Clark, 214 F.2d 148, 150, 102 USPQ 241, 243 (CCPA 1954). In light of the foregoing, we hereby sustain the examiner’s § 102 rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-14 as being anticipated by Mark. The decision of the examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in con- nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LINDA R. POTEATE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BRG:psb 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007