Appeal No. 2004-0847
Application No. 09/246,412
As a final point, we note that appellants base no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results, which would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness
established by the examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's
decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CATHERINE TIMM )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK:clm
-7-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007