The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex Parte BOBBY HU _______________ Appeal No. 2004-0912 Application No. 09/942,061 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before, WARREN, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicant appeals the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 21 to 25, 40, 41 and 57 to 59 all of the claims pending in the application.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.2 1 Appellants have canceled claims 42 to 56 in the after final communications filed March 13, 2003. The Examiner has entered this amendment. (Answer, p. 2). 2 We have considered Appellant’s position as presented in the Appeal Brief, filed March 13, 2003.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007